Avoidance Action Report
Bankruptcy Code section 547 empowers the debtor to avoid certain transfers made during the 90-day period (one year if the transferee was an insider) immediately before the commencement of a bankruptcy case. A lawsuit initiated to avoid such payments is called a “preference action.” The theory behind such actions is that the debtor was already insolvent at the time the payments were made and the payments therefore give preferential treatment to certain creditors over others ─ hence the names “preferential transfers” and “preference actions.”
Bankruptcy Code section 548 allows a trustee to avoid a “fraudulent transfer.” A fraudulent transfer is any transfer or obligation made within two years prior to filing for bankruptcy with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a present or future creditor. Under section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor may avoid fraudulent transfers and recover any property of the estate that was fraudulently conveyed to a third party. In the absence of fraudulent intent, a transfer may still be avoidable as “constructively fraudulent” under both the Bankruptcy Code and applicable state law if such transfer was made in exchange for less than reasonably equivalent value and (i) the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer, (ii) the debtor was rendered insolvent as a result of the transfer, or (iii) the transfer was made to an insider of the debtor.
Avoidance actions are a core focus of Neiger LLP’s bankruptcy practice and our attorneys are generally aware of the latest pertinent legal opinions related to avoidance actions. As an authority on avoidance actions, Neiger LLP publishes the Avoidance Action Report, which is a one-of-a-kind quarterly report devoted exclusively to case law developments related to avoidance actions. You can access Avoidance Action Report articles by clicking on the links below or you can download past issues in PDF format.
Winter 2010 Issue
(PDF opens in a separate window)
1. Courts Continue to Strengthen the “New Value” Defense
3. Motion for Summary Judgment Based on “Ordinary Course” Defense Denied
Summer 2009 Issue
(PDF opens in a separate window)
2. Repayment of Loan to Principals of Company was not Avoidable
3. No Safe Harbor for Redemption of Commercial Paper Prior to Maturity
4. No Cause of Action for Aiding and Abetting Fraudulent Conveyance
5. Arm’s Length, Pre-Petition Foreclosure Sale is Avoidable as a Preferential Transfer
Spring 2009 Issue
(PDF opens in a separate window)
1. Payments made to Purchase Privately Held Securities Are Not Avoidable
3. Credit Card Balance Transfers are Avoidable
Winter 2009 Issue
(PDF opens in a separate window)
1. Supply Contracts May Be Considered Commodity Forward Agreements, Immune to Avoidance Actions
2. Secured Lender is an “Insider” of the Debtor and Debtor’s Repayment of Loan Is Avoidable
3. Credit Card Balance Transfers Are Avoidable Preferential Transfers
Winter 2009 Issue
(PDF opens in a separate window)
1. Debtor’s Transfer of Casino Chips is Avoidable Under Section 547
2. Arbitration Clause is Not Enforceable In a Preference Action
3. Claims Arising from an Avoidance Action Can be Reinstated Against the Debtor Personally
4. Bank’s Release of Lien is a Contemporaneous Exchange for New Value
